Sampling redesign of soil penetration resistance in spatial t-Student models
Abstract
Aim of study: To reduce the sample size in an agricultural area of 167.35 hectares, cultivated with soybean, to analyze the spatial dependence of soil penetration resistance (SPR) with outliers.
Area of study: Cascavel, Brazil
Material and methods: The reduction of sample size was made by the univariate effective sample size ( ) methodology, assuming that the t-Student model represents the probability distribution of SPR.
Main results: The radius and the intensity of spatial dependence have an inverse relationship with the estimated value of the . For the depths of SPR with spatial dependence, the highest estimated value of the reduced the sample size by 40%. From the new sample size, the sampling redesign was performed. The accuracy indexes showed differences between the thematic maps with the original and reduced sampling designs. However, the lowest values of the standard error in the parameters of the spatial dependence structure evidenced that the new sampling design was appropriate. Besides, models of semivariance function were efficiently estimated, which allowed identifying the existence of spatial dependence in all depth of SPR.
Research highlights: The sample size was reduced by 40%, allowing for lesser financial investments with data collection and laboratory analysis of soil samples in the next mappings in the agricultural area. The spatial t-Student model was able to reduce the influence of outliers in the spatial dependence structure.
Downloads
References
Alamo S, Ramos MI, Feito FR, Cañas JA, 2012. Precision techniques for improving the management of the olive groves of southern Spain. Span J Agric Res 10 (3): 583-595. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012103-361-11
Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE, 2001. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Government Print Office, Washington DC. 41 pp.
Aparecido LEO, Rolim GS, Richetti J, Souza PS, Johann JA, 2016. Köppen, Thornthwaite and Camargo climate classifications for climatic zoning in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Cienc Agrotec 40 (4): 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542016404003916
Araújo DR, Mion RL, Sombra WA, Andrade RR, Amorim MQ, 2014. Variabilidade espacial de atributos físicos em solo submetido à diferentes tipos de uso e manejo. Rev Caatinga 27: 101-115.
Assumpção RAB, Uribe-Opazo MA, Galea M, 2014. Analysis of local influence in geostatistics using Student's t-distribution. J Appl Stat 41: 2323-2341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2014.909793
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC, 1995. Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex. 432 pp.
Bazzi CL, Souza EG, Uribe-Opazo MA, Nóbrega LH, Rocha DM, 2013. Management zones definition using soil chemical and physical attributes in a soybean area. Eng Agríc 33 (5): 952-964. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162013000500007
Bier AB, Souza EG, 2017. Interpolation selection index for delineation of thematic maps. Comput Electron Agric 136: 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.03.008
Cambardella CA, Moorman T, Parkin T, Karlen D, Novak J, Turco R, Konopka A, 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 1501-1511. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033x
Canarache A, 1991. Factors and indices regarding excessive compactness of agricultural soils. Soil Till Res 19: 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)90083-A
Carvalho LCC, Silva FM, Araújo G, Ferraz S, Silva FC, Stracieri J, 2013. Variabilidade espacial de atributos físicos do solo e características agronômicas da cultura do café. Coffee Sci 8: 265-275.
Coelho EC, Souza EGD, Uribe-Opazo MA, Pinheiro Neto R, 2009. Influência da densidade amostral e do tipo de interpolador na elaboração de mapas temáticos. Acta Sci Agron 31 (1): 165-174. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v31i1.6645
Colombi T, Keller T, 2019. Developing strategies to recover crop productivity after soil compaction - A plant eco-physiological perspective. Soil Till Res 191: 156-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.04.008
Cressie NAC, 2015. Statistics for spatial data, rev. ed. John Wiley & Sons, NY. 928 pp.
Dal Canton LE, Guedes LPC, Uribe-Opazo MA, 2021. Reduction of sample size in the soil physical-chemical attributes using the multivariate Effective Sample Size. J Agric Stud 9 (1): 357-376. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v9i1.17473
Dalposso GH, Uribe-Opazo MA, Johann JA, 2016. Soybean yield modeling using bootstrap methods for small samples. Span J Agric Res 14 (3): e0207. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016143-8635
Dalposso GH, Uribe-Opazo MA, Johann JA, Galea M, De Bastiani F, 2018. Gaussian spatial linear model of soybean yield using bootstrap methods. Eng Agríc 38 (1): 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v38n1p110-116/2018
De Bastiani F, Cysneiros AFJ, Cysneiros AHM, Uribe-Opazo MA, Galea M, 2015. Influence diagnostics in elliptical spatial linear models. Test 24: 322-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-014-0409-z
De Bastiani F, Galea M, Cysneiros AHMA, Uribe-Opazo MA, 2017. Gaussian spatial linear models with repetitions: An application to soybean productivity. Spat Stat 21: 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2017.07.013
Diggle P, Ribeiro Jr PJ, 2007. Model-based geostatistics. Springer, Lancaster. 228 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48536-2
Domenech MB, Castro-Franco M, Costa JL, Amiotti NM, 2017. Sampling scheme optimization to map soil depth to petrocalcic horizon at field scale. Geoderma 290: 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.12.012
EMBRAPA, 2013. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos, 3ed. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos, Brasília. 306 pp.
Fagundes RS, Uribe-Opazo MA, Guedes LPC, Galea M, 2018. Slash spatial linear modeling: soybean yield variability as a function of soil chemical properties. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 42: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170030
Griffith DA, 2005. Effective geographic sample size in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 95: 740-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00484.x
Grzegozewski DM, Cima EG, Uribe-Opazo MA, Guedes LPC, Johann JA, 2020. Spatial and multivariate analysis of soybean yield in the state of Paraná-Brazil. J Agric Stud 8 (1): 387-412. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v8i1.16303
Guedes LPC, Uribe-Opazo MA, Ribeiro Jr PJ, 2013. Influence of incorporating geometric anisotropy on the construction of thematic maps of simulated data and chemical attributes of soil. Chil J Agric Res 73 (4): 414-423. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392013000400013
Guedes LPC, Uribe-Opazo MA, Ribeiro Jr PJ, 2014. Optimization of sample design sizes and shapes for regionalized variables using simulated annealing. Cienc Invest Agrar 41 (1): 33-48. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202014000100004
Guedes LPC, Ribeiro Jr PJ, Uribe-Opazo MA, De Bastiani F, 2016. Soybean yield maps using regular and optimized sample with different configurations by simulated annealing. Eng Agríc 36 (1): 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p114-125/2016
Gülser C, Ekberli I, Candemir F, Demir Z, 2016. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in a cultivated field. Euras J Soil Sci 5 (3): 192-200. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.2016.3.192-200
Johann JA, Uribe-Opazo MA, Souza EGD, Rocha JV, 2004. Variabilidade espacial dos atributos físicos do solo e da produtividade em um Latossolo Bruno distrófico da região de Cascavel, PR. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 8 (2-3): 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662004000200008
Kestring F, Guedes LPC, De Bastiani F, Uribe-Opazo MA, 2015. Thematic maps comparison of different sampling grids for soybean productivity. Eng Agríc 35 (4): 733-743. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n4p733-743/2015
Krippendorff K, 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills. 412 pp.
Maltauro TC, Guedes LPC, Uribe-Opazo MA, 2019. Reduction of sample size in the analysis of spatial variability of nonstationary soil chemical attributes. Eng Agríc 39: 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39nep56-65/2019
Marinello F, Pezzuolo A, Cillis D, Chiumenti A, Sartori L, 2017. Traffic effects on soil compaction and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) taproot quality parameters. Span J Agric Res 15 (1): e0201. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017151-8935
Menezes MD, Silva SHG, Mello CR, Owens PR, Curi N, 2016. Spatial prediction of soil properties in two contrasting physiographic regions in Brazil. Sci Agric 73 (3): 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0071
Molin JP, Amaral LR, Colaço AF, 2015. Agricultura de precisão. Oficina de Textos, São Paulo. 224 pp.
Mooney CZ, 1997. Monte Carlo simulation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. 112 pp. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985116
Novomestky F, 2012. matrixcalc: collection of functions for matrix calculations. R package version 3.3.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/matrixcalc/index.html
Pautsch GR, Babcock BA, Breidt FJ, 1998. Optimal sampling under a geostatistical model. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa, USA. 32 pp.
R Development Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.0.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Ribeiro Jr PJ, Diggle PJ, 2001. geoR: a package for geostatistical analysis. R News 1: 15-18. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geoR/index.html
Rodrigues MS, Ramos RRD, Azevedo TP, Patrocínio Filho AP, Oliveira LG, 2014. Variabilidade espacial da resistência do solo à penetração em área capineira irrigada no semiárido. Agropecuária Científica no Semiárido 10: 161-166.
Rosalen DL, Rodrigues MS, Chioderoli CA, Brandão FJC, Siqueira DS, 2011. GPS receivers for georeferencing of spatial variability of soil attributes. Eng Agríc 31 (6): 1162-1169. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000600013
Schemberger EE, Fontana FS, Johann JA, Souza EG, 2017. Data mining for the assessment of management areas in precision agriculture. Eng Agríc 37 (1): 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n1p185-193/2017
Schemmer RC, Uribe-Opazo MA, Galea M, Assumpção RAB, 2017. Spatial variability of soybean yield through a reparametrized t-Student model. Eng Agríc 37 (4): 760-770. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n4p760-770/2017
Sivarajan S, Maharlooei M, Bajwa SG, Nowatzki J, 2018. Impact of soil compaction due to wheel traffic on corn and soybean growth, development and yield. Soil Till Res 175: 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.001
Soares A, 2014. Geoestatística para ciências da terra e do ambiente, 3rd ed. Press, Lisboa. 214 pp.
Sobjak R, Souza EG, Bazzi CL, Uribe-Opazo MA, Betzek NM, 2016. Redundant variables and the quality of management zones. Eng Agríc 36 (1): 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n1p78-93/2016
Tavares UE, Montenegro AAA, Rolim MM, Silva JS, Vicente TFS, Andrade CWL, 2014. Variabilidade espacial da resistência à penetração e da umidade do solo em Neossolo Flúvico. Water Resour Irrig Manage 3 (2): 79-89. https://doi.org/10.19149/2316-6886/wrim.v3n2p79-89
Uribe-Opazo MA, Borssoi JA, Galea M, 2012. Influence diagnostics in Gaussian spatial linear models. J Appl Stat 39: 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.607802
Valadão FCA, Weber OLS, Júnior DDV, Scapinelli A, Deina FR, Bianchini A, 2015. Adubação fosfatada e compactação do solo: sistema radicular da soja e do milho e atributos físicos do solo. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 39 (1): 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20150144
Valadão FCDA, Weber OLS, Júnior DDV, Santin MFM, Scapinelli A, 2017. Teor de macronutrientes e produtividade da soja influenciados pela compactação do solo e adubação fosfatada. Rev Ciênc Agrár 40 (1): 183-195. https://doi.org/10.19084/RCA15092
Vallejos R, Osorio F, 2014. Effective sample size of spatial process models. Spat Stat 9: 66-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.03.003
Wang JF, Jiang CS, Hu MG, Cao ZD, Guo YS, Li LF, Liu TJ, Meng B, 2013. Design-based spatial sampling: theory and implementation. Environ Model Softw 40: 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.015
Warrick AW, Nielsen DR, 1980. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In: Application of soil physics; Hillel D (ed.). pp: 319-324. Academic Press, NY. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-348580-9.50018-3
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
