Factors influencing the success of an artificial insemination program in Florida goats

  • F. A. Arrebola IFAPA Centro de Hinojosa del Duque, Junta de Andalucía, 14270 Hinojosa del Duque, Cordoba
  • B. Pardo IFAPA Centro de Hinojosa del Duque, Junta de Andalucía, 14270 Hinojosa del Duque, Cordoba
  • M. Sanchez Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cordoba, Campus de Rabanales, 14014 Cordoba
  • M. D. Lopez ACRIFLOR, Campus de Rabanales, 14014 Cordoba
  • C. C. Perez-Marin Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cordoba, Campus de Rabanales, 14014 Cordoba, Spain
Keywords: buck, fertility, fresh semen, goat, pregnancy

Abstract

An artificial insemination (AI) program using cooled semen was evaluated over a 7-year period in Florida goats. The effect of the following variables on pregnancy rates was analysed: production system, year and season of AI, synchronisation treatment, bucks, AI technicians, semen deposition site, days in milk at AI, milk yield and parity. Animals were reared under field conditions on commercial farms in southern Spain. Semen was collected from nine bucks and cooled at 4ºC until use. A total of 3941 goats were synchronised using intravaginal progesterone sponges and inseminated 46.0 ± 0.5 h. after sponge removal. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography 42-46 days after AI, obtaining an average pregnancy rate of 48.7%. Logistic regression showed that production system, AI year and season, bucks and semen deposition site had a significant effect (p<0.05) on pregnancy rate, while the other variables analysed were removed from the model. The final statistical model accounted for 59.7% of the cases analysed, suggesting that other factors not studied here may influence pregnancy rates in Florida goats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amoah EA, Gelaye S, 1997. Biotechnological advances in goat reproduction. J Anim Sci 75: 578-585. PMid:9051483

Barbosa LP, Guimaraes JD, Espeschit CJB, Costa EP, Souza RS, Dutra PA, Martins LEP, Cardoso Neto BM, 2009. Influence of site of deposition of semen in the reproductive tract on gestation rate and prolificacy of artificially inseminated goats. Proc 18th Brazilian Congress of Animal Reproduction, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, Abstract 190.

BOE, 2009. Royal decree 2129/2008, of 26 December, that establishes the National Program for the conservation, improvement and promotion of livestock breeds. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 23, 27/1/2009. [In Spanish].

Chebel RC, Santos JEP, Reynolds JP, Cerri RLA, Juchem SO, Overton M, 2004. Factors affecting conception rate after artificial insemination and pregnancy loss in latating dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 84: 239-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.12.012 PMid:15302368

Fatet A, Pellicer-Rubio MT, Leboeuf B, 2011. Reproductive cycle of goats. Anim Reprod Sci 124: 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.029 PMid:20888155

Garcia-Ispierto I, Lopez-Gatius F, Santolaria P, Yaniz JL, Nogareda C, Lopez-Bejar M, 2007. Factors affecting the fertility of high producing dairy herds in northeastern Spain, Theriogenology 67: 632-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.038 PMid:17118434

Hafez ESE, Hafez B, 2000. Transport and survival of gametes. In: Reproduction in farm animals (Hafez B & Hafez ESE, eds.). Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore MD, USA. pp: 82-95.

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, 1989. Applied logistic regression. Wiley, NY, USA.

Karatzas G, Karagiannidis A, Varsakeli S, Brikas P, 1997. Fertility of fresh and frozen-thawed goat semen during the nonbreeding season. Theriogenology 48: 1049-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00331-2

Leboeuf B, Manfredi E, Boue P, Piacere A, Brice G, Baril G, Broqua C, Humblot P, Terqui M, 1998. L’insémination artificielle et l’amélioration génétique chez la chèvre laitière en France. INRA Prod Anim 11: 171-181. [In French].

Leboeuf B, Restall B, Salamon S, 2000. Production and storage of goat semen for artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 113-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00156-1

Lopez-Gatius F, Garcia-Ispierto I, Santolaria P, Yaniz J, Nogareda C, Lopez-Bejar M, 2006. Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 65: 1678-1689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.027 PMid:16256186

Mellado M, Valdez R, Lara LM, Garcia JE, 2004. Risk factors involved in conception, abortion, and kidding rates of goats under extensive conditions. Small Rumin Res 55: 191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.10.016

Mellado M, Valdez R, Garcia JE, Lopez R, Rodriguez A, 2006. Factors affecting the reproductive performance of goats under intensive conditions in a hot arid environment. Small Rumin Res 63: 110-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.016

Meza CA, Ross TT, 2000. Factors affecting fertility and prolificacy of dairy goats inseminated with frozen-thawed semen. Proc 7th Int Conf on Goats. France, pp: 476-478.

Nahed J, Castel JM, Mena Y, Caravaca F, 2006. Appraisal of sustainability of dairy goat systems in Southern Spain according to their degree of intensification. Livest Sci 101: 10-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.08.018

Nunes JF, Salgueiro CCM, 2011. Strategies to improve the reproductive efficiency of goats in Brazil. Small Rumin Res 98: 176-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.036

Paulenz H, Söderquist L, Adnøy T, Soltun K, Saether PA, Fjellsøy KR, Andersen Berg K, 2005. Effect of cervical and vaginal insemination with liquid semen stored at room temperature on fertility of goats. Anim Reprod Sci 86: 109-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.06.007 PMid:15721662

Peterson K, Kappen MAPM, Ursem PJF, Nothling JO, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM, 2007. Microscopic and flow cytometric semen assessment of Dutch AI-bucks: Effect of semen processing procedures and their correlation to fertility. Theriogenology 67: 863-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.11.003 PMid:17126897

Ritar AJ, Salamon S, 1983. Fertility and frozen-thawed semen of Angora goats. Aust J Biol Sci 36: 49-59.

Roca J, Carrizosa JA, Campos I, Lafuente A, Vazquez JM, Martinez E, 1997. Viability and fertility of unwashed Murciano-Granadina goat spermatozoa diluted in Tris-egg yolk extender and stored at 5°C. Small Rumin Res 25: 147-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00978-9

Romano JE, Crabo BG, Christians CJ, 2000. Effect of sterile service on estrus duration, fertility and prolificacy in artificially inseminated dairy goats. Theriogenology 53: 1345-1353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00277-6

Salvador I, Viudes De Castro MP, Bernacer J, Gómez EA, Silvestre MA, 2005. Factors affecting pregnancy rate in artificial insemination with frozen semen during non-breeding season in Murciano–Granadina goats: a field assay. Reprod Dom Anim 40: 526-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00624.x PMid:16324078

Sanchez M, 2007. Las razas caprinas andaluzas de fomento. In: las razas ganaderas de Andalucía. Patrimonio ganadero andaluz, vol 2. Ed. Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca. Junta de Andalucía. Sevilla, pp: 403-405. [In Spanish].

Siqueira AP, Fonseca JF, Siva Filho JM, Bruschi JH, Viana JHM, Palhares MS, Bruschi MCM, Peixoto MP, 2009. Parametros reproductivos de cabras Toggenburg inseminadas com semen resfriado, após diluicao em meio à base de gema de ovo. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 61: 299-305. [In Portuguese]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352009000200003

Summermatter P, 1987. Erkenntnisse aus der Ziegenbesamung. Reprod Dom Anim 22: 73-79. [In German]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1987.tb00523.x

Published
2012-03-14
How to Cite
Arrebola, F. A., Pardo, B., Sanchez, M., Lopez, M. D., & Perez-Marin, C. C. (2012). Factors influencing the success of an artificial insemination program in Florida goats. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(2), 338-344. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012102-223-11
Section
Animal breeding, genetics and reproduction