Effects of genotype and harvest year on phytochemical and fruit quality properties of Turkish fig genotypes

  • O. Çalişkan Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mustafa Kemal, 31034 Antakya, Hatay
  • A. A. Polat Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mustafa Kemal, 31034 Antakya, Hatay
Keywords: antioxidant capacity, Ficus carica, fruit characters, fruit color, genotype, harvest year

Abstract

This study was conducted over three harvest years to determine effects of Turkish fig genotypes grown in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey on phytochemical and fruit quality characters. Fruit quality characters such as fruit weight, fruit width, fruit neck length, total soluble solids (TSS), pH, acidity, and TSS/acidity were examined. Total phenolics (TP), total anthocyanins (TA), antioxidant capacity (TAC), fructose (FRUC), glucose (GLUC), sucrose (SUC), and variables describing fruit skin and flesh colors (L*, a*, C, and hº) were also determined. Analysis of the data obtained from 12 fig genotypes, and three harvest years demonstrated a highly significant influence of genotype on phytochemical and fruit quality characters. ‘Bursa Siyahı’, which has dark black fruit skin, had the highest levels of TA (113.6 μg cy-3-rutinoside g-1 fw), TP (105.2 mg GAE/100 g fw), and TAC (10.9 mmol Fe2+ kg-1 fw). Three yearly averages of fruit weight ranged from 22.8 g (‘Sarı İncir’) to 57.5 g (‘Bursa Siyahı’), and ostiole width ranged from 0.9 mm (‘Bursa Siyahı’) to 3.7 mm (31-IN-16). These results indicate that TP (r=0.77) contents correlated moderately to TAC, more so than with TA (r=0.56). Both FRUC and SUC were negatively correlated with TA (r=-0.34 and r=-0.42, respectively). These data demonstrate that genotype is the main influence on the phytochemical and fruit quality characters of figs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

O. Çalişkan, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mustafa Kemal, 31034 Antakya, Hatay
Horticulture

References

Abidi W, Jiménez S, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y, 2011. Evaluation of antioxidant compounds and total sugar content in a nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] progeny. Int J Mol Sci 12: 6919-6935.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12106919
PMid:22072927 PMCid:3211018 

Aksoy U, Can HZ, Misirli A, Kara S, Seferoglu G, Sahin N, 2003. Fig (Ficus carica L.) selection study for fresh market in western Turkey. Acta Hort 605: 197-203. 

Beccaro G, Mellano MG, Botta R, Chiabrando V, Bounous G, 2006. Phenolic and anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity in fruits of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and of highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum L.) cultivars in north western Italy. Acta Hort 715: 553-558. 

Botti C, Franck N, Prat L, Ioannidis D, Morales B, 2003. The effect of climatic conditions on fresh fig fruit yield, quality and type of crop. Acta Hort 605: 37-43. 

Brooks SJ, Moore JN, Murphy JB, 1993. Quantitative and qualitative changes in sugar content of peach genotypes [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.]. J Am Soc Hort Sci 118: 97-100. 

Çalişkan O, Polat AA, 2008. Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Sci Hort 115: 360-367.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.017 

Çalişkan O, Polat AA, 2011. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of selected fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions from the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Sci Hort 128: 473-478.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.02.023 

Cámara MM, Diez C, Torija ME, 1996. Free sugars determination by HPLC in pineapple products. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 202: 233-237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01263546 

Cheng GW, Breen PJ, 1991. Activity of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and concentrations of anthocyanins and phenolics in developing strawberry fruit. J Am Soc Hort Sci 116: 865-869. 

Connor AM, Stephens JS, Hall HK, Alspach PA, 2005. Variation and heritabilities of antioxidant and total phenolic content estimated from a red raspberry factorial experiment. J Am Soc Hort Sci 130: 403-411. 

Costa RM, Magalhães AS, Pereira JA, Andrade PB, Valentão P, Carvalho M, Silva BM, 2009. Evaluation of free radical-scavenging and antihemolytic activities of quince (Cydonia oblonga) leaf: a comparative study with green tea (Camellia sinensis). Food Chem Toxicol 47: 860-865.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.01.019
PMid:19271320  

Del Caro A, Piga A, 2008. Polyphenol composition of peel and pulp of two Italian fresh fig fruits cultivars (Ficus carica L.). Eur Food Res Tech 226: 715-719.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0581-4 

Dueñas M, Pérez-Alonso JJ, Santos-Buelga C, Escrinano-Bailón T, 2008. Anthocyanin composition in fig (Ficus carica L.). J Food Comp Anal 21: 107-115.

 

Duthie GG, Duthie SJ, Kyle JAM, 2000. Plant polyphenols in cancer and heart disease: implications as nutritional antioxidants. Nutr Res Rev 13: 79-106.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/095442200108729016
PMid:19087434  

Flaishman MA, Rodov V, Stover E, 2008. The fig: Botany, horticulture, and breeding. Hort Rev 34: 113-197. 

Guerrero J, Ciampi L, Castilla A, Medel F, Schalchli H, Hormazabal E, Bensch E, Alberdi M, 2010. Antioxidant capacity, anthocyanins, and total phenols of wild and cultivated berries in Chile. Chilean J Agr Res 70: 537-544. 

Hegedús A, Engel R, Abrankó L, Balogh E, Blázovics A, Hermán R, Halász J, Ercisli S, Pedryc A, Bányai ÉS, 2010. Antioxidant and antiradical capacities in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) fruits: variations from genotypes, years, and analytical methods. J Food Sci 75: C722-729.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01826.x
PMid:21535583  

IPGRI, CIHEAM, 2003. Descriptors for figs. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome, Italy, and International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM), Paris, France.

 

Melgarejo P, Hernández F, Martínez JJ, Sánchez J, Salazar DM, 2003. Organic acids and sugars from first and second crop fig juices. Acta Hort 605: 237-239. 

Moretti CL, Mattos LM, Calbo AG, Sargent SA, 2010. Climate changes and potential impacts on postharvest quality of fruit and vegetable crops: a review. Food Res Int 43: 1824-1832.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.10.013 

Moyer RA, Hummer KE, Finn CE, Frei B, Wrolsrad RE, 2002. Anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant capacity in diverse small fruits: Vaccinium, Rubus, and Ribes. J Agr Food Chem 50: 519-525.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf011062r
PMid:11804523  

Oliveira AP, Valentão P, Pereira JA, Silva BM, Tavares F, Andrade PB, 2009. Ficus carica L.: Metabolic and biological screening. Food Chem Toxi 47: 2841-2846.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.09.004
PMid:19747518  

Oliveira AP, Silva RL, Andrade PB, Valentão P, Silva BM, Pereira JA, de Pinho PG, 2010. Determination of low molecular weight volatiles in Ficus carica using HS-SPME and GC/FID. Food Chem 121: 1289-1295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.054 

Ozkaya M, 1997. Selection studies on fig genotypes grown in Antakya region. Master's thesis. Mustafa Kemal Univ, Hatay, Turkey. 150 pp. [In Turkish].

 

Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Colombi B, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Bianchi M, Brighenti F, 2003. Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods, beverages and oils consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. J Nutr 133: 2812-2819.
PMid:12949370  

Piga A, Del Caro A, Milella G, Pinna I, Vacca V, Schirru S, 2008. HPLC analysis of polyphenols in peel and pulp of fresh figs. Acta Hort 798: 301-306. 

Polat AA, Çalişkan O, 2008. Fruit characteristics of table fig (Ficus carica) cultivars in subtropical climate conditions of the Mediterranean region. New Zeal J Crop Hort Sci 36: 107-115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01140670809510226 

Polat AA, Çalişkan O, 2009. Effect of different environments on fruit characteristics of table fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars. Proc IV Int Symp on Fig. Meknes, Morocco, Sept 29-Oct 3. pp: 107. 

Ruiz D, Egea J, Thomas-Barberan FA, Gil MI, 2005. Carotenoids from new apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties and their relationship with flesh and skin colour. J Agr Food Chem 53: 6368-6374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0480703
PMid:16076120  

SAS, 2005. SAS online doc, version 9.1.3. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA. 

Setser CS, 1993. Sensory properties. In: Encyclopaedia of food science (Macrae R, Robinson RK, Sadler MJ, ed). Food Technol Nutr Acad Press, London, UK. 

Silva RH, Abilio VC, Takatsu AL, Kameda SR, Grassl C, Chehin AB, Medrano WA, Calzavara MB, Registro S, Andersen ML et al., 2004. Role of hippocampal oxidative stress in memory deficits induced by sleep deprivation in mice. Neuropharmacology 46: 895-903.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2003.11.032
PMid:15033349  

Slinkard K, Singleton VL, 1977. Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Vitic 28: 49-55. 

Solomon A, Golubowicz S, Yablowicz Z, Grossman S, Bergman M, Gottlieb H, Altman A, Kerem Z, Flaishman MA, 2006. Antioxidant activities and anthocyanin content of fresh fruits of common fig (Ficus carica L.). J Agr Food Chem 54: 7717-7723.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf060497h
PMid:17002444  

Trichopoulou A, Vasilopoulou E, Georga K, Soukara S, Dilis V, 2006. Traditional foods: why and how to sustain them. Trends Food Sci Tech 17: 498-504.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2006.03.005 

Tsantili E., 1990. Changes during development of 'Tsapela' fig fruits. Sci Hort 44: 227-234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(90)90122-U 

Vinson JA, 1999. The functional food properties of figs. Cereal Food World 44: 82-87. 

Wang H, Cao GH, Prior RL, 1997. Oxygen radical absorbing capacity of anthocyanins. J Agr Food Chem 45: 304-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf960421t 

Wang KL, Micheletti D, Palmer J, Volz R, Lozano L, Espley R, Hellens RP, Chagnè D, Rowan DD, Troggio M, Iglesias I, Allan AC, 2011. High temperature reduces apple fruit colour via modulation of the anthocyanin regulatory complex. Plant Cell Environ 34: 1176-1190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02316.x
PMid:21410713

Published
2012-10-09
How to Cite
Çalişkan, O., & Polat, A. A. (2012). Effects of genotype and harvest year on phytochemical and fruit quality properties of Turkish fig genotypes. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(4), 1048-1058. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012104-2652
Section
Plant breeding, genetics and genetic resources